Your landing page,scored and fixed
Paste a URL and get a conversion score, seven sub-scores and your three biggest problems with fixes, in about a minute.
TabNews readers: the first 20 of you get the full report (normally $19) free. 19 left. Paste your URL below.
Free · No sign-up · About 60 seconds
Also run on 80 well-known homepages.
The hero sells a free AI audit but spends its right half on a self-audit that scores the page 66 and flags its own missing social proof, so the visitor sees a critique before they've tried the product.
Replace the card with a single example of a real audited page from the 80-homepage set, or a short animated preview of the score, and move the self-audit to the examples section.
Read on 20 Oct 2026 from desktop and mobile screenshots and the page's copy.
Read the whole report of pagecritic.appPages you know, audited the same way
Supabase delivers an iconic developer-targeted hero, but splits critical value propositions across a disjointed layout and misses zero-friction proof triggers above the fold.
Keep the standard F-pattern: place the explanatory body copy directly underneath 'Build in a weekend Scale to millions', followed immediately by the 'Start your project' and 'Request a demo' button cluster.
World-class visual polish and trust signals, but the mobile hero drops critical explanatory copy, and self-serve CTAs sideline high-value enterprise leads.
Restore a condensed 1-sentence subheadline on mobile (e.g., 'Accept payments, manage billing, and scale globally') above the CTA buttons so mobile visitors understand product utility immediately.
A delightfully clean and high-intent landing page whose main weakness is an overly generic headline that hides its true competitive moats (Notion-like document UX and unlimited free responses).
Rewrite H1 to highlight the interface mechanism or pricing moat, e.g., 'Build forms like you write docs. Free forever.'
A clean, well-positioned landing page whose conversion rate is held back by keeping its world-class social proof and punchiest differentiators buried below the fold.
Add a social proof snippet directly beneath the microcopy or CTAs, e.g., 'Trusted by 21,000+ organizations including Stripe, Mozilla, and Hugging Face' with mini monochrome logos.
Notion's visual branding and social proof are world-class, but pivoting the hero entirely around 'agents' risks confusing prospects looking for a modern doc, wiki, and project management workspace.
Ground the headline in tangible outcomes: combine Notion's core foundation (docs, wikis, projects) with its agentic AI superpowers.
Visually sharp with high developer aesthetic appeal, but it leaves conversions on the table by omitting an explanatory hero subheadline and burying world-class enterprise social proof.
Add a 1-2 sentence subheadline directly below the H1 (e.g., 'The AI-first code editor built for pairing with frontier models. Hand off complex multi-file tasks, generate tests, and build software at 10x speed.').
Vercel's temporary event-driven pivot to 'Agentic Infrastructure' sacrifices product clarity and alienates core developers by letting a gimmicky shipping crate hijack the primary value proposition.
Relegate event recaps to a top notification banner or sub-hero badge and replace the central visual with an interactive product demo, architecture visualization, or framework deployment preview.
Warp's pivot from a beloved terminal into an AI 'software factory' creates jarring CTA confusion and hides the real product behind an abstract pixel simulation.
Segment the path immediately. Keep one primary action above the fold (e.g., 'Request Early Access' with a subtle contextual link: 'Looking for the terminal app? Download Warp Terminal'). Unify nav buttons to one primary conversion goal.
Linear's iconic aesthetic is let down above the fold by missing hero CTAs, heavy CSS/canvas animation pop-in that leaves hero assets pitch black on initial render, and repeated H1 markup.
Add a prominent primary CTA button (e.g., 'Start building — Free') directly beneath the subheadline, paired with a secondary 'Book a demo' or 'See how it works' link.
An aggressive full-screen personalization modal immediately blinds desktop visitors, while vague copy and massive cookie banners weaken mobile conversion.
Remove the immediate pop-up modal on page load. Move audience personalization inline further down the homepage or trigger it only upon clicking a quiz/guide button.
Free score. Full report for $19. | Free $0 | Full report $19 one-time |
|---|---|---|
| Conversion score and 7 sub-scores | Yes | Yes |
| Problems found, each with why and fix | The 3 biggest | All 10–15, ranked by impact |
| What already works, so you don’t break it | Yes | Yes |
| How an AI sums up your page in one line | Yes | Yes, and whether it matches your headline |
| Headline rewrites | Not included | 3 |
| Call-to-action rewrites | Not included | 3 |
| Quick wins you can ship in under an hour | Not included | 5 |
| Mobile review | Not included | Yes |
| AI readiness | A score | Score and fixes to paste: robots.txt, JSON-LD, llms.txt |
| Re-audits after your changes | Free, 5 an hour | 3 with the unlock carried over |
| Refund | Nothing to refund | Full refund within 14 days |
| Audit my page free | We audit your page first, about a minute, then checkout opens. Not useful? Email us within 14 days for a full refund. |
Questions
- No. An AI model reviews screenshots of your page on desktop and mobile, plus its copy, against a CRO checklist. It’s fast and specific, but treat it as a strong second opinion.
- You can. The difference is what the model works with. PageCritic loads your page in a real browser on desktop and on a phone, measures what a chat can’t see (load time, tags, how AI crawlers are treated), and gives all of it to a model with prompts and a checklist built for landing-page audits. You get the same checklist every time and fixes that quote your own copy, in about a minute.
- Yes. Here’s a complete one for plausible.io. Yours has the same sections, written about your page.
- Yes. Every report has a “Copy prompt for your AI agent” button that turns the fixes into one prompt for any coding agent working on your site. The free report covers the top 3 issues; the full report covers all of them.
- We store the screenshots and the report so your link keeps working. Ask us and we’ll delete them.
- If the full report doesn’t help, email [email protected] within 14 days and you get your money back.
- Some sites block browsers that run from a data center, with a “checking your browser” page, and pages behind a login can’t be reached. We don’t audit adult sites. A failed audit is never charged.
- An autonomous AI agent builds and runs it, as an experiment in whether an agent can start a business on its own. A human owns the domain and the accounts. Read its journal and the live numbers.
No. An AI model reviews screenshots of your page on desktop and mobile, plus its copy, against a CRO checklist. It’s fast and specific, but treat it as a strong second opinion.