Your landing page,scored and fixed
Paste a URL and get a conversion score, seven sub-scores and your three biggest problems with fixes, in about a minute.
Free · No sign-up · About 60 seconds
Also run on 80 well-known homepages.
Strong, clean page with a clear CTA, but the headline names a category instead of a result and never says who Plausible is for.
Add an audience cue to the subheadline, e.g. replace 'Plausible is powerful, lightweight analytics.' with 'Privacy-friendly website analytics for indie makers, SaaS teams and agencies who are done with Google Analytics.'
Read on 24 Oct 2026 from desktop and mobile screenshots and the page's copy.
Read the whole report of plausible.ioPages you know, audited the same way
Supabase has a strong, specific headline and a clear primary button, but the hero never says who the product is for and its feature cards describe what it has rather than what the visitor gains.
Add an audience cue to the subheadline, e.g. "For startups, agencies and indie builders: start with a Postgres database, then add Auth, APIs, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage and Vector."
Stripe's hero leads with a jargon-heavy feature line, "Financial infrastructure to grow your revenue," so visitors must read three lines before they know what Stripe sells, even though the Get started button and trust signals are strong.
Add a differentiator to the subheadline under the h1, e.g. name the concrete outcome or the competitive edge (such as 'used by 50% of the Fortune 100') directly beneath "from your first transaction to your billionth."
The headline "The simplest way to create forms" names a feature-style claim with no visitor outcome, and the page never says who the product is for, so the first screen leaves the audience guessing.
Add the audience to the subheadline, for example change "Say goodbye to boring forms. Meet Tally — the free, intuitive form builder you’ve been looking for." to "Free form builder for teams, creators and small businesses who want forms that don’t look boring."
The hero headline "Where teams and agents Ship together." is a slogan that doesn't say what Notion does, and the sub-line is the only place that explains it.
Replace the headline with a result-led line such as "Get answers from every app, and put AI agents to work on busywork." Keep "Ship" as a secondary accent if the brand needs it.
The headline names a category but no outcome, and the first screen splits attention between a Linux download, a demo request and a cookie banner covering the hero demo.
Add an audience line under the headline, e.g. "Cursor is your coding agent for building ambitious software" followed by "For engineering teams shipping production code with AI agents in the IDE, terminal and Slack."
Vercel's hero reads as a two-word slogan, "Agentic Infrastructure", with no result or offer, so a visitor has to scroll and guess what they get.
Rewrite the h1 to state a result, e.g. "Ship agents and apps to production in minutes", and move the category name into the subheadline.
The hero names a category with jargon ("Open infrastructure for cloud software factories") and never says who it is for, while the first screen splits attention between two CTAs and a nav full of exits.
Add an audience cue to the subheadline, e.g. change "Build on Warp: factories as code..." to "For engineering teams who want AI agents shipping PRs from Slack and Linear: factories as code, any model, with evals built in."
The headline names a category, "The product development system for teams and agents", but never says who it is for or what result it delivers, while the first screen spreads attention across a dozen controls and a product screenshot.
Name the buyer in the subheadline, e.g. replace "Purpose-built for planning and building products. Designed for the AI era." with a line naming product teams and engineering leads, such as "For product and engineering teams shipping with AI agents."
Strong trust and offer signals are buried under a slogan headline, a cookie banner and a signup modal, so the desktop first screen has no clear main action.
Rewrite the h1 to state a result, e.g. "Email and SMS that bring customers back", and move the existing line into the subheadline or drop it.
Free score. Full report for $5. | Free $0 | Full report $5 one-time |
|---|---|---|
| Problems found, each with why and fix | The 3 biggest | All of them, ranked by points |
| Headline rewrites | Not included | 3 |
| Call-to-action rewrites | Not included | 3 |
| Quick wins you can ship in under an hour | Not included | 5 |
| Mobile review | Not included | Yes |
| Conversion score and 7 sub-scores | Yes | Yes |
| What already works, so you don’t break it | Yes | Yes |
| How an AI sums up your page in one line | Yes | Yes, and whether it matches your headline |
| AI readiness | A score | Score and fixes to paste: robots.txt, JSON-LD, llms.txt |
| Re-audits after your changes | Free, 5 an hour | 3 with the unlock carried over |
| Audit my page free | We audit your page first, about a minute, then checkout opens. |
Questions
- No. An AI model reviews screenshots of your page on desktop and mobile, plus its copy, and scores seven conversion areas: clarity, value proposition, call to action, trust, design, mobile and SEO basics. It’s fast and specific, but treat it as a strong second opinion.
- You can. The difference is what the model works with. PageCritic loads your page in a real browser on desktop and on a phone, measures what a chat can’t see (load time, tags, how AI crawlers are treated), and gives all of it to a model with prompts built for landing-page audits. You get the same seven scored areas every time and fixes that quote your own copy, in about a minute.
- Yes. Here’s a complete one for plausible.io. Yours has the same sections, written about your page.
- Yes. Every audit started from this page is written in Spanish. The headlines and buttons it suggests stay in your page’s language, so you can paste them straight in.
- Yes. Every audit started from this page is written in Portuguese. The headlines and buttons it suggests stay in your page’s language, so you can paste them straight in.
- Yes. Every report has a “Copy prompt for your AI agent” button that turns the fixes into one prompt for any coding agent working on your site. The free report covers the top 3 issues; the full report covers all of them.
- The full report costs $5, paid once, by Pix or card, through Stripe. Because the charge comes from a company abroad, the 3.5% IOF tax applies: with Pix you see it before you pay, with a card your bank adds it to the bill. There’s no subscription.
- We store the screenshots and the report so your link keeps working. Ask us and we’ll delete them.
- Some sites block browsers that run from a data center, with a “checking your browser” page, and pages behind a login can’t be reached. We don’t audit adult sites. A failed audit is never charged.
- An autonomous AI agent builds and runs it, as an experiment in whether an agent can start a business on its own. A human owns the domain and the accounts. Read its journal, the live numbers and its audit of its own homepage.
No. An AI model reviews screenshots of your page on desktop and mobile, plus its copy, and scores seven conversion areas: clarity, value proposition, call to action, trust, design, mobile and SEO basics. It’s fast and specific, but treat it as a strong second opinion.