11 SaaS Landing Page Examples, Scored
Looking at good saas landing pages is useful, but "this looks nice" doesn't tell you why a page works or what it still gets wrong. So we ran 11 homepages from well-known SaaS companies through PageCritic, the same audit anyone can run for free, and published the results as they came out: the overall conversion score, 7 sub-scores, each page's biggest issue with a concrete fix, and one thing it does well.
Audited on 2026-10-24. Scores are an AI's opinion of conversion best practices, based on desktop and mobile screenshots plus the page's HTML. They aren't measured conversion rates, and these companies didn't ask for a review. Pages change often; each link below goes to the full free report with the screenshots we judged.
The scores
| # | Page | Score | Clarity | Value prop | CTA | Trust | Design | Mobile | Speed & SEO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | plausible.io | 88 | 70 | 80 | 100 | 87 | 100 | 100 | 90 |
| 2 | supabase.com | 78 | 70 | 60 | 73 | 87 | 70 | 93 | 100 |
| 3 | cal.com | 75 | 60 | 67 | 60 | 100 | 80 | 80 | 90 |
| 4 | resend.com | 75 | 70 | 67 | 80 | 67 | 70 | 93 | 80 |
| 5 | notion.com | 72 | 45 | 53 | 80 | 80 | 80 | 100 | 80 |
| 6 | stripe.com | 71 | 60 | 47 | 73 | 67 | 80 | 93 | 90 |
| 7 | loom.com | 69 | 50 | 33 | 73 | 87 | 70 | 100 | 80 |
| 8 | vercel.com | 65 | 45 | 33 | 67 | 80 | 60 | 93 | 90 |
| 9 | calendly.com | 65 | 35 | 40 | 73 | 87 | 50 | 100 | 80 |
| 10 | posthog.com | 61 | 45 | 47 | 67 | 73 | 60 | 67 | 80 |
| 11 | linear.app | 56 | 50 | 33 | 33 | 53 | 70 | 87 | 80 |
| Average | 70 | 55 | 51 | 71 | 79 | 72 | 91 | 85 |
All scores are out of 100. The last row is the SaaS average, the tick every page is measured against on its teardown.
What the patterns say
- Weakest area on average: Value prop (51), then Clarity (55). Even companies with big design teams leave points on the table here.
- Strongest area: Mobile (91). Polished visuals are table stakes for these brands. They don't make up for a vague headline or a buried call to action.
- Headlines are too vague. On 9 of 11 pages, the headline was one of the top 3 issues: it names a category or a slogan instead of saying what the product does and for whom.
- The common fixes are cheap. Most top issues are copy and layout: a headline that says what the product does, a line of proof under the hero, a short note under the button. None of them needs a redesign.
Page by page
plausible.io
88The headline names the category and a feature-level promise ("Easy to use and privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternative") but never says who it is for or what the visitor gains, so the strong buttons and proof sit under a generic hero.
- Top issue
- No audience named in the hero.The headline and subheadline never say who Plausible is for (marketers, agencies, SaaS founders, bloggers). The page lists Ecommerce, SaaS, Agencies and Publishers only in the nav and footer, so a visitor cannot tell within the first screen whether this is for them.
- Fix
- Add an audience cue to the subheadline, e.g. change "Plausible is powerful, lightweight analytics." to "Simple web analytics for SaaS founders, ecommerce stores and agencies who want answers without a Google Analytics learning curve."
- What works
- The headline states plainly what the product is: a privacy-friendly Google Analytics alternative, and the logo and nav reinforce it.
supabase.com
78Supabase has a strong, specific headline and a clear primary button, but the hero never says who the product is for and its feature cards describe what it has rather than what the visitor gains.
- Top issue
- No stated target audience.The hero only says "Start your project with a Postgres database" and never names who it serves (indie devs, startups, agencies, AI builders). Visitors who don't see themselves in the page are likely to leave.
- Fix
- Add an audience cue to the subheadline, e.g. "For startups, agencies and indie builders: start with a Postgres database, then add Auth, APIs, Edge Functions, Realtime, Storage and Vector."
- What works
- The headline "Build in a weekend / Scale to millions" states a clear result, promising speed now and growth later in a few words.
cal.com
75The headline "The better way to schedule your meetings" is a slogan that names no concrete result, and the first screen hands visitors three competing actions, one of them a generic "Sign up with Google".
- Top issue
- Headline is a slogan, not a result."The better way to schedule your meetings" claims superiority without saying what the visitor gets, so a first-time visitor cannot tell what changes for them in seconds.
- Fix
- Rewrite the h1 to state an outcome, e.g. "Stop the back-and-forth. Get meetings booked in one link." and move the vague claim into the subheadline.
- What works
- The subheadline "A fully customizable scheduling software for individuals..." states plainly what the product is directly under the headline.
resend.com
75The hero says "Email for developers" with no outcome, so a visitor learns the category but not why Resend beats the email tool they already use.
- Top issue
- No 'try it safely' reassurance in the hero.Developers evaluating an email API worry about accidentally emailing real people. The only reassurance on the page sits deep in the feature section as 'Test mode', and the hero offers no low-risk way to try it.
- Fix
- Add a short line under the hero CTAs such as "Try it free, no real emails sent in test mode", or link the 'Documentation' button to a sandbox/test-mode quickstart.
- What works
- The H1 'Email for developers' plus the subline 'Deliver transactional and marketing emails at scale' makes clear within seconds that this is an email sending product.
notion.com
72The hero headline "Where teams and agents Ship together." is a slogan that doesn't say what Notion does, and the sub-line is the only place that explains it.
- Top issue
- Headline is a slogan, not a result."Where teams and agents Ship together." reads as a tagline; a visitor cannot tell from it what they get, so the first thing they read carries no outcome.
- Fix
- Replace the headline with a result-led line such as "Get answers from every app, and put AI agents to work on busywork." Keep "Ship" as a secondary accent if the brand needs it.
- What works
- The headline is short and large at 96 px, so it is the first thing read on desktop.
stripe.com
71Stripe's hero leads with a jargon-heavy feature line, "Financial infrastructure to grow your revenue," so visitors must read three lines before they know what Stripe sells, even though the Get started button and trust signals are strong.
- Top issue
- No clear 'why this one' reason.The hero offers generic growth language with no differentiator against Adyen, PayPal or Square, so a visitor has no reason to pick Stripe over alternatives.
- Fix
- Add a differentiator to the subheadline under the h1, e.g. name the concrete outcome or the competitive edge (such as 'used by 50% of the Fortune 100') directly beneath "from your first transaction to your billionth."
- What works
- The line "50% of Fortune 100 companies have used Stripe to grow their businesses" gives strong, specific social proof.
loom.com
69Loom's hero leads with a slogan, "One video is worth a thousand words", and pushes the actual offer into a subheadline, so a first-time visitor doesn't learn what they get in the first glance.
- Top issue
- Headline is a slogan, not a result."One video is worth a thousand words" is a generic proverb that could sit on any video tool's page. Visitors have to read the subheadline before they know what Loom does for them.
- Fix
- Replace the proverb with a concrete result the visitor wants, for example "Replace long meetings and emails with a 2-minute video", and keep the current subheadline as support.
- What works
- The subheadline "Easily record and share AI-powered video messages with your teammates and customers" states plainly what the product is.
vercel.com
65Vercel's hero reads as a two-word slogan, "Agentic Infrastructure", with no result or offer, so a visitor has to scroll and guess what they get.
- Top issue
- Headline is a slogan, not a result."Agentic Infrastructure" names a category but promises no outcome, so a visitor cannot tell what they will gain from staying.
- Fix
- Rewrite the h1 to state a result, e.g. "Ship agents and apps to production in minutes", and move the category name into the subheadline.
- What works
- The two-word h1 is large, at 64 px, and sits left of the logo mark, so it is the first thing the eye reads.
calendly.com
65The headline "All the work around meetings, handled." is a polished slogan that never says what Calendly does or for whom, and a cookie banner covers the first screen on desktop and phone.
- Top issue
- No stated audience in the hero.Nothing in the first screen says who Calendly is for. Visitors have to scroll to the 'Built for people whose work runs on meetings' section to learn whether it fits their job, so many bounce before they decide it is relevant.
- Fix
- Name the audience in the subheadline, for example: "Scheduling, follow-ups and meeting notes for consultants, founders and sales teams." Replace "From AI-powered scheduling to automated meeting recaps and follow-ups" with wording that names a role.
- What works
- The headline is short, large (72 px) and centred, so it is the first thing the eye reads.
posthog.com
61The hero headline "Your product's context layer" is a jargon slogan that doesn't say what you get, and the first screen splits attention across a carousel, a sidebar of 30+ links and a cookie popup that covers part of the offer.
- Top issue
- Headline is a slogan, not a result."Your product's context layer" names a category but no outcome, so a visitor landing from search or an ad can't tell what they'll gain in the first few seconds.
- Fix
- Replace the H1 with a headline that states the result, e.g. "Find out why users drop off, and fix it faster", and move "context layer" into the subheadline.
- What works
- The headline is short (4 words) and set large at 36 px, so it is the first thing read.
linear.app
56The headline names a category, "The product development system for teams and agents", but never says who it is for or what result it delivers, while the first screen spreads attention across a dozen controls and a product screenshot.
- Top issue
- No audience named.Nothing in the hero says who Linear is for; "teams and agents" is abstract and a visitor cannot tell if this is for their role or company.
- Fix
- Name the buyer in the subheadline, e.g. replace "Purpose-built for planning and building products. Designed for the AI era." with a line naming product teams and engineering leads, such as "For product and engineering teams shipping with AI agents."
- What works
- The desktop first screen has a clear light "Sign up" button in the header, and the phone view keeps it visible next to Log in.
Use these lessons on your own page
See all 80 homepages in one list: landing page examples, scored and ranked, or browse all 94 teardowns.
Other categories, scored the same way:
Start with the first screen: what belongs above the fold. Then test your headline in the free headline analyzer and your button text in the CTA checker, and check how you look in Google with the meta tag checker. For a full pass, work through the 30-point landing page checklist.
Free score, 7 sub-scores and your top 3 issues, with desktop and mobile screenshots. The full report (all issues ranked by impact, headline and CTA rewrites, quick wins) is $5.